We’ve misunderstood scalability. Teams celebrate petabyte-scale data lakes and user count spikes, obsessing over metrics and load capacity. But the teams that actually scale aren’t managing bigger numbers—they’re building systems that simplify development. True scalability isn’t about handling load—it’s about making the next feature easier to ship than the last one.
Most teams handle analytics by building features first, then adding tracking later. Even with modern tooling, it is separate from core functionality, creating a constant tax on development. Engineers write features, then add tracking. Analysts specify events, then wait for implementation. It’s a cycle that slows everyone down.
Smart teams make tracking native to their components from the start. A well-designed button isn’t just styled markup—it’s a complete package that knows how to track itself. This isn’t just cleaner code; it’s a shift in how teams work. Engineers get analytics for free. Analysts can predict available data by looking at the component library. Product managers can spec features knowing the insights they will have access to.
Composability
This shift from bolted-on to built-in transforms our building process. Components become more than UI elements—they’re building blocks that carry behavior and intelligence. A “Subscribe” button isn’t just managing visual state; it’s maintaining a contract about subscription behavior, tracking, and data insights. Design systems aren’t just about consistent visuals—they’re about consistent behavior. Data pipelines aren’t valuable because they’re big—they’re valuable because they turn data into insights faster.
e/acc
This approach is more powerful with AI tools. When developers well-structure components and define behaviors, tools like Cursor don’t just suggest code—they understand and extend your patterns. Each suggestion builds on your existing primitives, maintaining the patterns that make your system scalable. AI isn’t replacing engineers; it’s enhancing teams that build for composability.
The best systems aren’t the ones that handle the most load—but the ones that help you build. Their power isn’t measured in capacity, but in how much easier they make the next iteration. When you get this right, you stop asking “can it handle the load?” and start asking “what can we build next?” That’s when you know you’re building for growth.